Increasing cultural diversity in Australia:
The results of the 2016 national Census showed that Australia is a fast changing, ever-expanding, culturally diverse nation. In communities across the country there was an increasing variety in terms of country of birth, languages spoken, whether people are of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent, and religious affiliation (or secular beliefs) (see reference at footnote 1). For example, the 2016 Census shows that:
• two thirds (67 per cent) of the Australian population were born in Australia
• nearly half (49 per cent) of Australians had either been born overseas (first generation Australian) or had one or both parents born overseas (second generation Australian)
• over 300 separately identified languages were spoken in Australian homes and more than one-fifth of Australians spoke a language other than English at home.
MAQ considers that Australia’s growing cultural diversity presents new challenges and opportunities, including for policy makers and program designers, to better understand and respond to the needs of people, particularly those from new and emerging communities or those who are not easily ‘identifiable’ through current data collection measures.
MAQ notes the historic development of the inclusion of the ‘ancestry’ question in 1986 and its subsequent removal in the following two Censuses. MAQ welcomed the reintroduction of the ‘ancestry’ question in 2001 and its subsequent five-yearly collection to date, which, in association with other existing Census topics such as ‘Country of Birth’, ‘Year of Arrival in Australia’, ‘Country of Birth of parents’ and ‘Languages spoken’ helps understand cultural and linguistic diversity of Australia’s increasingly multicultural population.
Gap in identification of Australians’ cultural identity:
MAQ is aware through many years of working closely with diverse cultural and ethnic communities, that identifying cultural diversity is becoming increasingly complex given the increasingly rich diversity of our country’s population.
While existing Cultural Diversity Census topics can be used together to identify particular ethnic or cultural groups, they do not necessarily provide information on the cultural or ethnic group that a person currently identifies with. For the purposes of government agencies and their service providers, current identification is important as it shapes lifestyle choices, behaviours, belief systems, relationships and social systems.
The Australian Bureau of Statistics Standards for Statistics on Cultural and Language Diversity (p.11) highlight the complexity of identifying cultural identity, and limitations with using measures such as ancestry alone: “ancestry in the Australian context is complex as there are many Australians with origins and heritage that do not, in practice, relate to their current ethnic identity. Ancestry data alone, therefore, is not considered a good measure of service needs or the extent to which persons from certain backgrounds are associated with advantage or disadvantage. When Ancestry data is used alone, it should only be done to represent a broad measure of cultural diversity” (see reference at footnote 2).
Although ancestry and ethnic identity are related, they are also separate and distinct entities that when elicited, may provide different responses from people. Ancestry has a focus on fore-bearers and ancestral heritage; ethnicity, on the other hand, has a focus on current identification. For example:
• children born to second generation migrants, who were born in Australia, who have spent their entire lives in this country (e.g. second generation Chinese migrants - although ancestrally the children may identify as ‘Chinese’, they may not speak a Chinese language and may more readily identify themselves as ‘Australian’)
• cultural groups that can only be identified by ethnicity or sometimes languages they speak (e.g. Karen born in Thailand).
Proposed new topic ‘ethnicity’:
To improve identification of cultural and ethnic groups, including those who may not otherwise be captured in existing Census questions, MAQ recommends the inclusion of a new question on ‘ethnicity’ in addition to the existing census topics. The collection of data on ethnicity, in addition to data on ancestry and all other existing variables relating to Cultural Diversity, will greatly enhance the richness and quality of data on Australia’s multicultural population, highlight groups that are currently ‘not visible’ and will improve policy and program design to better respond to the needs of community.
The Queensland Government recognises the importance and positive impacts of improving collection of statistical information commensurate with the increasing cultural and linguistic diversity of the population. Section 19C of the Multicultural Recognition Act 2016 (the Act) requires that the multicultural policy must provide for a consistent approach across government for collecting statistical information about the diversity of people who use services provided by government entities . The Queensland Multicultural Policy and Action Plan thereby sets out requirements for Queensland Government agencies to collect data on cultural and linguistic diversity as follows:
• Minimum mandatory indicators: ‘Country of Birth’, ‘Preferred language’ and ‘Language required’.
• Desirable indicators: ‘Ethnicity (or cultural identity)’.
Identified Queensland Government agencies are required to develop agency implementation plans outlining steps needed for the government agency to collect and report on the minimum mandatory indicators. A number of Queensland Government agencies are currently collecting data on ethnicity, and a number of others are making provisions to collect ethnicity data in future.
The demand and interest in measuring the ethnic and cultural composition of the Australian population is growing as both community and Governments are seeking to better understand, and respond to, diverse cohorts of people. ABS, through mechanisms such as the Census, is well positioned to lead the way on improvements to how cultural and ethnic diversity is measured into the future.
Footnotes:
1. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/lookup/Media%20Release3
2. http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/CA25687100069892CA256889000C9E88/$File/12890_1999.pdf